The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the defendant was assaulted by the victim who was under F contact with the management office, but even though the defendant did not have inflicted an injury on the victim, the court below found the facts charged and found the defendant guilty, which affected the conclusion of the judgment, by misunderstanding the facts charged.

2. The judgment of the court below and the court below consistently stated that, in the police and the court below's decision that "A witness E scambling the F, general affairs S with the head of the management office in the police and the court below's decision, the defendant scambling to the management office, and the victim scambling to the management office, and the defendant scamed to the face of the victim while scaming to the management office." The police officer G dispatched to the scene at the time at the time at the time at the time at the time at the time at the time at the time at the time at the court of the court below stated that "the victim was scambling to the victim's face by means of scambling the victim's face," but the defendant was aware of the victim's punishment intent for the victim at the scene at the time at the time at the time at the time at the time at the time at the court of the court below and the court below's decision that "the victim was aware of the victim's face at the victim's face 2."

There was a side of the body on the part of the body of the body of the diagnosis seamen and the body of the body of the body of the body.

"On the other hand," the statement.