beta
Text
1. Defendants B, C, D, E, F, H, I, J, and L are each Defendant listed in the separate sheet among the real estates listed in the separate sheet to the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Determination as to the Plaintiff’s claim against Defendant B, C, D, E, F, H, I, J, and L
(a)be as shown in the attachment of the claim;
B. Defendant B, D, E, F, C, H, and L: Judgment by deeming confession (Article 208(3)2 of the Civil Procedure Act) by means of service by public notice (Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act)
C. If so, Defendant B, C, D, E, F, H, and L are liable to implement the registration procedure for transfer of ownership for each of the Defendant’s shares in the real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant real estate”) on March 15, 1998.
2. Determination as to the Plaintiff’s claim against Defendant G, K, and M
A. 1) The instant real estate was owned by N andO as an unregistered building constructed around February 15, 1993. 2) The Plaintiff occupied the instant real estate from February 15, 1993.
3) Defendant B, D, E, F, I, J, L, andO (O) died on October 7, 2008 and died on or around May 30, 201 as his/her heir, and there is Defendant C, G, H, K, and M as his/her heir. [Grounds for recognition] Defendant G: Evidence A: Evidence A (No. 1), Evidence A (No. 4, Evidence A (No. 10), Evidence A (No. 14), Defendant K, and M by public notice (Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act)
B. The plaintiff's judgment as to the plaintiff's primary claim was purchased on or around March 15, 1998 the real estate of this case, which was owned by the network N and the networkO, and therefore, the defendant G, K, and M, the heir of the networkO, are obligated to implement the registration procedure for ownership transfer based on the sale and purchase on March 15, 1998 with respect to the above Defendants' shares among the real estate of this case. Thus, the plaintiff's primary claim against the above Defendants can only be recognized as the fact that the seller selling the real estate of this case to the plaintiff around the above date is the network N, even if based on the statement in Gap evidence No. 1.