The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below (one year of imprisonment) on the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The lower court determined the Defendant’s punishment by comprehensively taking into account the circumstances favorable to the Defendant (such as the fact that the Defendant was committed at the time of the commission of the crime, the fact that the illegal persons want to take the Defendant’s preference, the fact that the illegal persons disposed of the vehicles, etc.) and unfavorable circumstances [the Defendant did not have any special changes in circumstances that make it possible to change the sentence of the lower court after the sentence of the lower judgment, even though there were six times the past punished by drinking driving during the period from 1999 to 2016 (six times of fine, three times of year 199, year 207, and suspended execution of each year 2016).

In addition, even if examining the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, motive and background of the crime, means and result of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, etc., as shown in the arguments in this case, it is not recognized that the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

3. Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.