The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal merely explained the "technology converting 2D into 3D" developed by the Defendant, and completed the development of the video-based video-based video-based video-based video-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-

“ or “The use of this technology would be 10 billion won or more that would be invested, and a corporation would open the office in the Guero in December by creating a corporation, and if the investment is made to B 100 million won, the shares would be 1%, and 5% which would be 5 times that would be 5.

“” and “not having received an investment.”

2. The following facts and circumstances, which can be recognized by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below, are, namely, ① D and F, consistent from investigative agencies to the court below, to the court below, and directly, the Defendant’s “it is possible to use this technology to invest more than 10 billion won in the world’s first 3D M&D development, and to open the office in the Guero in December of the establishment of a legal entity, and 10 million won is 1% of the shares, and 5% of the five times the amount is 5.

“Admonished”

(2) At the time, the Defendant was trying to operate a business with H and K to automated technology development, etc., which rhys up the 2D image using the 3D conversion program developed by K to 3D image. However, K did not inform the Defendant and H of the core technology of the 3D conversion program developed by itself. While the Defendant developed a 3D conversion program different from H, it appears that the development of technology was not completed to the extent that it could be immediate commercialized, ③ there was no circumstance in which the victim made an additional investment, or the business was conducted, such as creating profits by using the technology, and H and H also have developed technology due to the lack of funds.