logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2017.08.17 2017고정436
절도
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On December 15, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for special larceny, etc. in the Jeonju District Court’s Eup branch court’s Seoul District Court’s Seoul District Court’s decision was finalized on December 23, 2016.

[Criminal facts] On October 8, 2016, around 02:30, the Defendant: (a) opened an office with no locking device; and (b) intruded inside the office, and stolen the cash owned by the victim E, which is kept in the U.S. Treasury in the U.S. and kept in the U.S. Treasury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. E statements;

1. Report of investigation (specific suspect);

1. On-site reports on results of field identification, field identification photographs, and fingerprints assessment results at crime scene;

1. Previous conviction in judgment: Inquiry about criminal history and application of the text of the judgment;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of punishment, and the choice of fines;

1. After Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 39 (1) of the same Act:

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the Defendant committed a second offense despite having been punished several times for the same crime, and that the Defendant has not recovered from damage, etc. is disadvantageous to the Defendant.

However, as indicated in the record of the crime in this case, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment of one year and six months with prison labor for special larceny, etc. in the Eup branch of the Jeonju District Court as indicated in the judgment, and the judgment becomes final and conclusive. In particular, the above case was sentenced on December 15, 2016, and the Defendant was investigated to the effect of confession at the police station of Jeonjin-jin, and the case was sent to the Jeonju District Public Prosecutor's Office on November 16, 2016, and was transferred to the Jeonju District Public Prosecutor's Office on December 1, 2016, and was transferred to the Jeonju District Public Prosecutor's Office on December 30, 2016, and the summary order was issued again to the Jeonju District Public Prosecutor's Office on December 30, 2016, and the contents and frequency of the finalized criminal facts.

arrow