beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 16,00,000 for the Plaintiff and its related KRW 5% per annum from May 24, 2019 to March 20, 2020 and March 20, 2020.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On May 2019, the Defendant: (a) received a proposal from an employee under the name of “C” (hereinafter “C”) who was involved in the commission of telecommunications-based financial fraud (hereinafter “Sing”); (b) received cash from the victims; and (c) conspired to commit the commission of the singinging fraud, along with the name of the victim.
B. At around 09:00 on May 21, 2019, the official under the name of the court below stated that the Plaintiff, who was not in charge of the prosecution’s duties and received money from the Plaintiff, misrepresented the prosecution investigator with the phone number, such as “D,” even though there was no fact that the illegal investigation was conducted at all,” and that “the only passbook account was discovered in the course of the illegal loan investigation. There was an illegal loan of KRW 36 million from the current account in the current name, and unless this part is proved immediately, the personal account should be investigated. The withdrawal of KRW 36 million from the current account and delivery to E is called as “the withdrawal of KRW 36 million from the current account.” The Defendant transferred from Ulsan to Ulsan and received money from the Plaintiff, and received the money from the Plaintiff, and received the money from the Plaintiff, and received the money from the Plaintiff, and then received the money from the Plaintiff to the account transfer, and then the Defendant misrepresented the Plaintiff’s cash account transfer and received the money from the Plaintiff “Seoul Hospital, 36.”
C. On May 22, 2019, the employee of the name scam scam scam scam scam scam scam scam scam scam scam scam to the Plaintiff who had been called the prosecutorial investigator, and “36 million won issued by the party” was proved, but scam scams scams
However, there is a long-term loan that is illegal in H because the insiders of the financial right dominates.
Therefore, it is necessary to see the frien of the Frien of the Frien of the Republic of Korea. However, if the loan is granted from H, the inside of the financial right is frien of the loan, and it is not the suspect.