The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence of one-year imprisonment imposed by the court below on the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is recognized that the defendant recognized all of the facts charged of this case and reflects the truth that the defendant paid a considerable amount of money to the victims and agreed smoothly with the victims. On the other hand, since the crime of Bosing, such as this case, is very poor in the number of crimes and is serious social harm thereby, it is necessary to strictly punish the defendant involved, and the sum of the amount obtained by three victims reaches KRW 84 million, and the defendant plays a key role in completing the crime of Bosing in this case as the so-called "measures for soliciting remittance books and passbooks", and the defendant plays a key role in the completion of the crime of this case. The degree of participation was significant, and the defendant has a record of criminal punishment including three times of punishment for the same crime of fraud, there is no special change in circumstances to change the punishment of the court below after the decision of the court below was made, and there is no other change in circumstances to change the punishment of other accomplices, the equity, age, character and conduct of the defendant, family relationship, and the sentencing guidelines of this case.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.

(However, in accordance with Article 25(1) of the Regulation on Criminal Procedure, the "Act No. 8" of the judgment of the court below is applied to the "Act No. 2" of the judgment of the court below as "Article 50".