A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On September 2, 2012, at around 15:00, the Defendant stated “301,” in the bill of indictment No. 503, the Defendant: (a) but at the house of E, which is seen as a clerical error in “503,” the Defendant came to enter the password known in advance, cancelled the corrective device, and entered with C, and (b) he came to have one television of the amount equivalent to KRW 2.80,00,000 at the market price.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen goods together with C.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. E prosecutorial statement;

1. The statement of each police officer made to F and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on seizure records;

1. Article 331 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts;

1. Article 53 or 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation ( Taking into account the fact that the defendant is against his/her duty and the fact that the stolen article has been returned and whose damage has been substantially recovered);

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of not less than Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (the same grounds as the above);