All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. Judgment on Defendant A’s appeal

A. The gist of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (fine 15 million won and confiscation) is too unreasonable.

B. Although the Defendant’s judgment is against the Defendant and there is no record of punishment for the same kind of crime, etc., the instant crime is committed in favor of the Defendant. However, the Defendant’s punishment is too unreasonable considering the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant’s punishment is too unreasonable, considering the following: (b) the Defendant’s character, age, environment; (c) the size of a sexual traffic business establishment; (d) the size of a sexual traffic business establishment; and (e) the motive, circumstance, means and consequence of the crime; and (e) the circumstances that are conditions for sentencing indicated in the record, such as the circumstances after the crime, etc., as the Defendant’s punishment is too unreasonable.

2. On May 1, 2012, the Defendant, who was dissatisfied with the judgment of the court below, filed an appeal on May 1, 2012, and did not submit the statement of grounds for appeal to the effect that the Defendant did not submit the statement of grounds for appeal by the lapse of 20 days from the receipt of the notification of the receipt of the trial records and the written notice of the appointment of a state appointed defense counsel from this court on May 30, 2012, and the petition of appeal does not contain any indication of the grounds for appeal,

3. In conclusion, Defendant A’s appeal is without merit and is dismissed pursuant to Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. Defendant B’s appeal shall be dismissed by decision pursuant to Article 361-4(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act. However, as long as Defendant A’s appeal is rendered, it shall be dismissed by a single judgment. It is so decided as per Disposition.