1. The Defendant dated August 24, 2010, as to the Plaintiff’s share 14,169/36,435 in 36,435 cubic meters of Gangwon-gun forest C, Gangwon-do, Gangwon-do.

Basic Facts

On January 15, 2009, the Plaintiff purchased from D forest C, 36,435 cubic meters of Gangwon-gun, Gangwon-do (hereinafter “Tcheon-gun”) from D, and completed the registration of ownership transfer on the same day. On August 7, 2009, the Plaintiff sold to the Defendant 14,169/36,435 shares out of Seocheon-gun’s land (hereinafter “Tcheon-gun’s share in land”), and completed the registration of ownership transfer on August 12, 2009.

On the other hand, E completed the registration of ownership transfer on February 1, 2006, 2006, FF 426.1 square meters, G large 87.9 square meters, and seven-story accommodation facilities of reinforced concrete structure sloping roof (the combination of the above land and Helel buildings; hereinafter the same shall apply). On August 27, 2010, E completed the registration of ownership transfer on the ground of sale as of August 19, 2010.

[Grounds for recognition] Each entry and the purport of the entire pleadings in Gap 1-1-1-3, 2-1, 2-2, 3, and 9-4.

In full view of the purport of Gap 4 and 7's written statements and the whole pleadings as to the cause of the claim, the defendant, on August 24, 2010, transferred the Incheon real estate between the plaintiff and the plaintiff on August 24, 2010 to the person designated by the defendant, and delivered to the plaintiff a letter of gift (A 4) that transfers the shares of the land owned by the defendant to the plaintiff. The defendant demanded the defendant's wife I to transfer Incheon real estate in the future, and accordingly, it can be acknowledged that the ownership transfer registration has been completed in the first future for Incheon real estate on August 27, 2010.

According to the above facts, the defendant agreed to the plaintiff on August 24, 2010 (hereinafter referred to as the "agreement of this case") (the agreement of this case is referred to as the "agreement of this case").

(2) According to the reasoning of the lower judgment, the Plaintiff is obligated to perform the procedure for the registration of ownership transfer with respect to the portion of the land in Incheon. Although the Defendant’s assertion was prepared on August 24, 2010, the Defendant is obligated to perform the procedure for the registration of ownership transfer with respect to the portion of the land in Incheon. However, the said written confirmation was concluded between the Defendant and the E,