All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Defendant 1) misunderstanding of facts and misunderstanding of legal principles are merely aware of the act of delivering cash to a foreign bitcos as an act of purchasing cash, and there was no awareness of the fact that the said act was an act of collecting the amount of damage from Bophishing. Nevertheless, there was an error of misunderstanding of facts and misunderstanding of legal principles as to aiding and abetting crimes. 2) The sentence imposed by the lower court of unfair sentencing (one year of imprisonment) by the Defendant is too unreasonable.

B. The sentence imposed by the lower court on the Defendant is too uneasible and unfair.

2. Judgment on the mistake of facts and misapprehension of legal principles by the defendant

A. The Defendant argued to the same effect in the lower court.

In light of the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below and detailed circumstances as stated in its ruling, the court below rejected the above argument and found the defendant guilty on the ground that it is reasonable to view that the defendant committed a crime in the manner of allowing the defendant, even though the defendant was not aware of all the specific contents and methods of the crime of Bosing, even though he did not know about the overall crime of Bosing.

B. The above judgment of the court below is examined closely with the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below. The judgment of the court below is just, and there is no error of law by misunderstanding of facts or misunderstanding of legal principles as to aiding and abetting crimes, such as the defendant's assertion.

In addition to the following circumstances known by the above evidence, this is the more.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion of mistake and misapprehension of legal principles.