1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows, in addition to “an addition or dismissal” under Paragraph (2) and Paragraph (3) of Article 8 of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, since the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance.

2. A part concerning addition or height;

A. The following is added to the fourth 18 line of the judgment of the first instance court. The Plaintiff’s written statement of the Plaintiff’s written statement - the Plaintiff’s wishing to substitute E is not merely a decomposition, but is still believed to be “I wish to keep the Plaintiff’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son

2) On the last 12th of the 3rd decision of the first instance court, “In addition, the Plaintiff’s statement made by the person who is the person who is the verbal violence was not done voluntarily and there was no reinforcement evidence, thereby violating Article 12(7) of the Constitution by recognizing the fact of such verbal violence.”

3) Then, the part of the 8th 17th 17th 17th 2 judgment of the first instance court is “it is difficult to view that the purport of the above provision is “it is difficult to view that only the teachers belonging to the exclusive organization in charge of school violence may conduct an investigation in light of the language and purpose of the school violence law”. 4) The following is added to the nine-thirdsth of the judgment of the first instance.

C) Article 12(7) of the Constitution as to the violation of Article 12(7) of the Constitution and Article 12(7) of the Constitution concerning the confession of a criminal defendant does not apply to the plaintiff who is not the defendant, and as seen earlier, evidence such as a written confirmation of E is also proven in addition to the plaintiff's statement made by the person

Therefore, the plaintiff's above assertion is without merit.

A person shall be appointed.

(b) 1) The fourth 14 lines of the judgment of the court of first instance are raised “the report” as “the corridor”. 2) The fifth 3 lines of the judgment of the court of first instance.