logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2018.02.02 2017가단14887
건물명도 등
Text

1. The Defendants jointly do so to the Plaintiff:

(a) deliver the buildings listed in the separate sheet;

B. From February 4, 2017, the above A.

Reasons

On July 1, 2015, the Plaintiff and Defendant B entered into a lease agreement with a rental deposit of KRW 5 million, monthly rent of KRW 660,00,000, and the contract period from July 1, 2015 to June 30, 2016, and each of the parties did not explicitly express his/her intention to renew the contract. After Defendant B’s request, the Plaintiff and Defendant B continued to enter into a lease agreement with the same terms and conditions as the existing lease agreement (However, the contract term was set on February 28, 2018), and the Defendants did not pay a deposit of KRW 5 million, monthly rent of KRW 660,00,00, and the contract term was from July 1, 2015 to June 30, 2016. It is evident that the Defendants’ intent to terminate the lease agreement was not disputed between the parties and the Defendants’ intent to terminate the lease agreement.

Therefore, the above lease agreement concluded between the Plaintiff and the Defendants is terminated, so the Defendants are obligated to deliver the instant building to the Plaintiff and pay the amount calculated by the ratio of KRW 660,00 per month from February 2017 to the completion date of delivery of the said building.

If so, the plaintiff's claim shall be accepted for the reasons and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow