beta
Text
1. 30,000 won, out of 1,394,05,278 won deposited by the Seoul East Eastern District Court No. 1161 on March 27, 2014.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. 1) The Defendant and the International Industry Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “International Industry”)
(3) Dawd Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Dawd Construction”)
(1) The term “mort forest creation works” (hereinafter “instant development works”) ordered by Giguk-si on December 2, 2009 by organizing a consortium (hereinafter “instant development works”).
After being selected as a successful bidder on February 8, 2010, the contract was concluded with respect to the instant created construction work by fixing the construction cost of KRW 36,827,695,000 and the construction period from February 9, 2010 to December 30, 201. The above consortium (hereinafter “Defendant consortium”).
Around May 1, 2011, Defendant 83% and international industry 17% were due to the withdrawal from the Chungcheong Construction. (ii) Defendant consortium and admitting City changed the instant construction contract as the instant construction was suspended due to the delayed expropriation of the project site and obstacles, delay in authorization and permission, etc. (hereinafter “instant construction extension”). On July 16, 2013, the instant construction contract was finally concluded by setting the construction cost of KRW 55,767,225,00, and the period of construction from February 9, 2010 to July 21, 2013.
3) On June 10, 2010, the Plaintiff’s earth and sand work among the instant creation work from the Defendant (hereinafter “instant earth and sand work”).
(1) The Plaintiff received a subcontract by setting the construction cost as KRW 4,475,882,591, and the construction period as from June 10, 201 to September 30, 201. The contract was revised on two occasions thereafter to July 21, 2013, and finally, the construction cost of KRW 15.37758 billion and the construction period as from June 10, 2010 to September 30, 2013; however, the Plaintiff’s labor cost, incidental expenses, etc. due to the extension of the air of this case were settled at the time of the completion of the settlement between the Defendant and the Defendant (hereinafter referred to as the “instant subcontract”).
(4) The creation of the instant case is made by the Corporation on January 2013.