1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. A. Around April 11, 1911, the net C received an assessment as to the 898 square meters prior to the Gyeonggiwon-gun.

B. The defendant Hasung-si was divided into the F. 805 square meters and G. 93 square meters on the date in terms of the king E (which seems to change the administrative district of the Suwon-gun D) and completed registration of initial ownership around October 2, 1962.

C. On July 18, 1981, the Flux 805 square meters (the registration of conversion into the area of 2661 square meters on January 31, 197) of the foregoing Masung-gun was combined with H on July 18, 1981 at the same time with the change of land category, and G 93 square meters (the registration of conversion into the area of 307 square meters on January 31, 197) was cancelled on June 5, 1978 at the same time with the change of land classification as a school site.

The original land category H was the land category of G, but was changed into a school site on June 5, 1978, and it was merged with G, F, J on July 18, 1981, which was changed into a 6262mm2 due to the change of the administrative district name on April 20, 1995, and was changed into a 6262m2m2 in Suwon-gu, Suwon-gu, Suwon-gu. The change of the administrative district name was changed to a 6262m2m2 on November 24, 2003.

E. On February 18, 1993, Defendant Gyeonggi-do completed the registration of transfer of ownership on the ground of succession on March 26, 1991 with respect to the 6262 square meters of the K school site in Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, which was merged as above.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence Nos. 3 through 9, purport of whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff's assertion that the deceased T, who is the plaintiff's supporting part of the plaintiff's assertion, was subject to land assessment as to the Gyeonggiwon-gun D 898, and the plaintiff's assistance L, who succeeded to it. The deceased on September 14, 1978, and the deceased on September 14, 1978, the plaintiff was solely succeeded to the property. After the registration of preservation of ownership was made without any reason, the plaintiff was made by dividing it into the school site B of Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and then he again made the registration of transfer of ownership to the defendant Gyeonggi-do. Thus, the above registration of merger and the registration of transfer of ownership is null and void without any reason.

3. The judgment net C.