The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the Defendant is recognized as the following facts: (a) the Defendant made a confession of all of the instant crimes; (b) made a statement that his or her mistake is against the depth; and (c) the Defendant’s child suffers from Aussabacera-gun and thus requires continuous treatment.

However, the Defendant has already been sentenced to a four-time fine due to drinking, unlicensed driving, and a one-time suspended sentence, and the Defendant committed the instant crime without being aware of it during the suspended period, and the Defendant appears to have continuously driven a vehicle without obtaining a license since a driver's license was revoked due to drinking driving around 2010. The Defendant's blood alcohol content at the time of the instant crime is 0.124% higher, and the Defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the instant crime, and all of the sentencing conditions indicated in the records of the instant case, such as the circumstances after the instant crime, are considered as follows. Thus, the Defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.