logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.12.04 2014가합505647
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendant: (a) each of the 58,941,49 won against Plaintiff A and B, Plaintiff C and D respectively, and each of the above amounts of KRW 2,50,000 and each of the above amounts.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

(a) Status 1 of a party - net E (FF, hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”);

on March 12, 2012, during the first year of the university, after having been admitted to the Army Training Center and received education, the same year.

5. On August 18, 198, the Army Manpower Support Headquarters G headquarters, having been transferred to the three major units (hereinafter referred to as “affiliated units”) and serving as an operator of goods handling equipment for the same year.

5. 30. 06 06:04 A person who died by cutting the pel structure to the steel structure at the site of the renovation and repair works for the relevant building;

2) The Plaintiff A and B are the deceased’s parents, the Plaintiff C’s form, and the Plaintiff D’s performance. B. As a result of the examination on the deceased’s performance, the deceased was determined as “nicking” as a result of the examination conducted by the Military Manpower Administration prior to admission. However, on March 12, 2012, the military performance test conducted by the Army Training Center was determined as follows: “it is anticipated that military life is difficult and there is a risk of an accident (reference to the type of accident and accident forecast): The type of accident forecast: suicide forecast, mental disorder forecast, and “accident concern” among the above examination results, the Plaintiff C was determined as “nicking without good belief about South” with respect to the part of the mental disorder among the explanation of the mental disorder among the above examination, and with respect to the part of the adaptation problem among the explanation related to the accident, it can be determined as follows.

However, the Army Training Center did not take measures such as the treatment of the deceased or the treatment of a private hospital after the result of the examination, even though the above performance of the duties was examined.

2. On April 20, 2012, the Deceased completed his/her education for new illness at the Army Training Center on April 20, 2012, and was admitted to the Army Education Team at the Army Education Team for the same year

5. By the 18th day, the driver completed the driving course and transferred it to the affiliated party on the same day.

Captain H, who is a commander of the third rank, did not hold a direct interview with the deceased, who is a transferred soldier, and only six days have passed since the deceased transferred.

arrow