The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the original court’s imprisonment (ten months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable;

2. Determination is an element for sentencing favorable to the Defendant, with regard to the following facts: (a) the Defendant recognized the crime; and (b) the Defendant asked the victims to pay for the admission of children to a university; (c) the Defendant committed the instant crime; and (d) the Defendant did not have any past record of having been punished; and (c) there was no record of having been severe

However, in full view of the factors of sentencing disadvantageous to the Defendant, including the fact that the amount of damage in this case was not much and the damage was not completely recovered, the Defendant committed the crime in this case by using the parent’s mind that he committed the crime, and the Defendant, as if he was aware that it was impossible to enter a school with a way that he could not enter the school, acquired the money by deceiving it as possible, and promoted social confidence in the course of college admission, and other factors of sentencing indicated in the records of this case, the

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.