logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2014.09.24 2013고단6992
업무상배임
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

An application for compensation by an applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who has been awarded five days' total beginning on November 5, 2009 (36 units, 600,000 won per unit) and twenty days' total beginning on December 20, 2010 (36 accounts, 600,000 won per unit), and each of the above limits is a so-called "successful Bidder" and the successful bidder's successful bidder's successful bidder's successful bidder's successful bidder's successful bidder's successful bidder's successful bidder's successful bidder's successful bidder's successful bidder's successful bidder's successful bidder's successful bidder's successful bidder's successful bidder's successful bidder's successful bidder's successful bidder's successful bidder's successful bidder's successful bidder's 60,00 won, and only the remaining amount calculated by dividing the cooperative amount paid by the successful bidder's successful bidder's successful bidder's successful bidder's successful bidder's successful bidder's 60,000 won by the number of successful bidder's successful bidder's successful bidder's.

1. On October 5, 2012, the Defendant in occupational breach of trust related to the five-day system: (a) around 19,200,000 won (excluding KRW 1,200,000,000,000, not paid by the Defendant E and F, and KRW 2,400,000,000,000, not paid by the Victim C) from the Defendant’s house located in Incheon Strengthening-gun Group; (b) around October 5, 2012, the Defendant acquired economic benefits equivalent to that amount and incurred property damage equivalent to that amount by failing to pay to the Defendant, who was awarded a successful contract in violation of the duty to pay the Victim, even if there was a duty to pay the amount to the Defendant.

2. On November 20, 201, the Defendant entered the 20-day occupational breach of trust in the account book as if he/she received a successful tender in violation of his/her occupational duty to pay KRW 18,324,00,00 from the 20-day fraternity members at the Defendant’s house at the above 20-day fraternity at the Defendant’s house, and as if he/she received a successful tender from the fraternity G, and in fact, the Defendant actually acquired the equivalent pecuniary benefits, and incurred a loss equivalent to the equivalent amount from the 20-day occupational breach of trust, from that time to October 20, 2012, from that time, the amount of KRW 165,290,50 in total nine times until October 20, 2012 as indicated in the list of crimes in the attached Table.

arrow