logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 제천지원 2016.11.24 2015고정125
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 18, 2014, around 04:25, the Defendant expressed that the victim E (the 16-year-old) who was born at the top of the Dju shop located in Dacheon City C was slick, and was slicked by the victim during the time when the victim was slick. The Defendant slicked the victim’s head on a numberless vehicle that was parked in the vicinity, regardless of slicking the victim’s breath, and the Defendant slicked the victim’s face at least eight times on the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the year.

As a result, the defendant, together with F, damaged the reputation of the head part in need of about 17 days medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The witness E and G’s legal statement, and the witness F’s legal statement;

1. Some statements in each police interrogation protocol against the accused or F;

1. Each police statement of E;

1. A report on occurrence of a case, autopsy, and internal investigation report (Attachment to a written diagnosis of injury of the victim E);

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserts that at the time, the defendant only told F when the victim was injured, and that there was no assault as stated in its reasoning.

However, in full view of the following circumstances revealed by the above evidence, the defendant sufficiently recognized the fact that the victim's head was faced with the victim's head in the following numberless vehicles, regardless of the breath's breath, as stated in its reasoning.

The victim made a concrete and consistent statement from an investigative agency to this court in its contents as stated in its reasoning.

F, an accomplice, stated in the investigative agency and in this court that “B was sleeped with the victim’s bucking and slicking with the victim. The Defendant did not look at the victim, and the victim slicked with the victim by selling the victim, and thereby the victim slicked with the gate.” G, an accomplice, may not be aware of who was the witness in this court, was sleeped at the time of ‘at the time’ and who was slicking with the victim.

arrow