logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2013.03.21 2012고정2831
절도
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 200,000 won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 16:40 on March 30, 2012, the Defendant: (a) posted a photo of the victim D within 704 Do Government-dong 704, Do Government-si, Gyeonggi-do, the New World Department Store 10, the New World Department Store 10, and (b) stolen the Defendant’s cash 86,000 won, which is the victim’s possession, using the gap in the side-hand machines to correct the photograph, and using the gap in the side-hand machines in order to correct the photograph, and using one credit card issued by the new bank.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Partial statement of witness E;

1. A criminal investigation report (general);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged articles;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Determination on the assertion of the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the confinement of the workhouse

1. The Defendant alleged that he was trying to steal a wall that was far away from the floor, and that he did not commit a theft.

2. In light of the following circumstances, it is reasonable to view that the Defendant had had the intention of theft and the intention of unlawful acquisition at the time of bringing the wall to the victim, in light of the following circumstances: (a) whether the Defendant had the intention of unlawful acquisition; (b) whether the Defendant had the intention of unlawful acquisition; (c) whether the Defendant had the intention of unlawful acquisition; and (d) whether the Defendant had the intention of unlawful acquisition; and (e) whether the Defendant had the intention of unlawful acquisition and the intention of unlawful acquisition, at the time when the Defendant brought the wall to the victim at the time of finding the wall; and (e) whether the Defendant had the intention of theft and the intention of unlawful acquisition.

arrow