Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months.
except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
A victim B is a company that imports and sells golf products from a foreign-registered golf product company, such as C and D, and the defendant works as the head of the business team of the BP branch office, which is located in the third floor of the Busan Shipping Daegu building from October 1, 2014 to October 7, 2019, and is engaged in golf products sales and customers management.
1. In a place where the location cannot be known around December 8, 2014, the fraud Defendant called “the delivery request is made in F because he sent phone to the employee in charge of the order of the victim company, because he ordered Aar and Darber from F.”
However, the facts did not have been ordered from F to A. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L.
The Defendant had the victim company deliver 26,153,30 of the market price of the same day 26,153,300 and 30 of the market price of 31,500,500 and 5300 NS 4NS R 30 of the market price, 9,394,770 of the market price, and 14VI Q Ra 21 of the market price, and then had the victim company deliver them from F to other persons. The Defendant received golf products in the same way as shown in attached Table (1) from around 2019 to September 5, 2019, totaling 325,662,760 won.
Accordingly, the defendant deceptioned the victim company and acquired the property from the victim company.
2. Around June 25, 2015, the Defendant was required to return 3015,000 won or more at the “H Yangsan store” located in Chungcheongnam-si G in Yangsan-si, Yangyang-si. The Defendant was required by the representative I to return 3015,000 won or more at the market price from the said representative I, and the Defendant was able to keep the said Raber 115 out of I in custody for the victim company.
around that time, the Defendant did not return the above 115 drones to the victim company, and the Defendant.