Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

Around 00:56 on June 26, 2013, the Defendant was driving a CWz car and was driving a four-lane road of 27-8, Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu, Seocho-gu, Seocho-gu along the four-lanes of the said road from the offline of a new history history to the offside of the said road. Notwithstanding the duty of care to ensure that a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to safely drive the road and prevent an accident by safely driving the right and the right and the right and the right and the right, the Defendant neglected the duty of care to prevent the accident. However, the Defendant was negligent in driving the E-ro cab, which was stopped to let the passenger get off in the front and rear end of the vehicle driven by the victim D (57 years old) (57 years old), and suffered injury such as salt and tension in need of treatment for the victim, and at the same time, the Defendant did not immediately stop the said taxi and take necessary measures for rescue and relief of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement of the suspect interrogation protocol of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Written statements prepared by D;

1. Statement of the actual survey report;

1. Each description of a written diagnosis and written estimate;

1. Statement of an investigation report (as to the confirmation of medical treatment);

1. Application of each video statute to photographs of taxi photographs of damaged vehicles;

1. Relevant Article 5-3 (1) 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the crime (the point of failing to take measures after destroying the article);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act Article 334(1) of the provisional payment order is that the defendant is the first offender and the crime is recognized, and the vehicle operated by the defendant is covered by the comprehensive insurance.