The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

Criminal facts have to be proved to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt (Article 307(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act). However, the preparation of evidence and the probative value of evidence conducted on the premise of fact-finding belong to the free judgment of the fact-finding court (Article 308 of the Criminal Procedure Act). For the reasons stated in its reasoning, the lower court recognized that the first instance judgment was justifiable to recognize the fact that the Defendant threatened the victim, as stated in the first instance judgment, thereby raising money from the damaged party, and that the Defendant sustained a knife knife, which is a dangerous thing, and inflicted bodily injury by rape the victim, and rejected the Defendant’s allegation of the grounds for appeal as to the mistake of facts and misapprehension

The allegation in the grounds of appeal is the purport of disputing the determination of the lower court’s fact-finding, and is merely an error in the determination of the lower court’s choice of evidence and probative value, which belong to the free judgment of the fact-finding court. In addition, even if examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the aforementioned legal doctrine and the evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err by failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations as alleged in the grounds of appeal, exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on “in

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.