logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2014.05.29 2013가합3730
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 110,430,00 for the Plaintiff and 6% per annum from April 6, 2013 to May 29, 2014.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On August 21, 2009, the Public Procurement Service, under the Plaintiff’s control, issued a notice of tender “the purchase of chloasium (import acid)” (hereinafter “the instant tender”). On September 9, 2009, the Defendant submitted to the Public Procurement Service a unit price bid stating that the purchase of 54,000 tons of chloasium (import acid) would be 11,043,000 won (kg 204.5 won).

B. Meanwhile, in the instant bid, the Public Procurement Service exempted the tender participants from the payment of the bid bond, and required them to submit a written request for the payment of the bid bond, and the Defendant submitted the “written request for the payment of the bid bond” to the Public Procurement Service, stating that “The Defendant, after the Defendant was selected as the successful bidder, submitted the “written request for the payment of the bid bond” with the bid bond, stating that it will pay an amount equivalent to at least 5% of the successful bidder’s bid

C. The Defendant was selected as a successful bidder in the instant bid, and the procuring agency notified the Defendant of the acceptance of the purchase contract on September 11, 2009, and the national territory of the Republic of Korea notified the Defendant of the acceptance of the purchase contract, and the national territory of the Republic of Korea is the National Integrated Electronic Procurement System (KOEPS) which was prepared to enable the Defendant to process the entire process of public procurement online. A through B, if there is no error in confirming the purchase contract for the procurement commodities transmitted to the Defendant via file, the Defendant must re-transmit the purchase contract to the procuring agency and pay at least KRW 1,104,30,000 of the contract bond by September 18, 2009.

Nevertheless, on September 18, 2009, the defendant submitted to the Public Procurement Service a letter of contract guarantee to the effect that the issuance of the letter of contract guarantee is delayed by the Seoul Guarantee Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter "Seoul Guarantee Insurance") and did not pay the contract deposit by the said deadline.

E. On September 18, 2009, the Public Procurement Service shall be the final time limit under Article 17, Paragraph 1, of the purchase of goods (manufacture) and the bid price for the Defendant.

arrow