The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (one million won of a fine) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment is based on the facts that the defendant led to the crime of this case and that the degree of damage caused by the crime of this case is not significant. However, the defendant asserts that if the settlement agreement is reached with the victim DD management body about the overdue management fee, the electric usage fee for the larceny of this case would also be paid. However, no damage recovery was made up until the trial. However, considering the favorable circumstances for the defendant, the judgment of the court below was already preferred by imposing a fine to be reduced by more than the fine amount of the summary order (2 million won) in consideration of the circumstances favorable to the defendant, and considering the fact that the defendant had the power to be punished for the same crime, the court below's punishment is appropriate, and the defendant's argument is not accepted.

3. Accordingly, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition.