1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for 10 months for each of the crimes against the victim D, E, F, and G, and the rest of each of the crimes.

Punishment of the crime

On March 26, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment with prison labor and two years of imprisonment with prison labor at the Changwon District Court for fraud, etc. and on October 28, 2009, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on January 28, 201, and the remaining term of punishment was expired on May 18, 201 during the execution of the said punishment. On April 20, 2012, the Changwon District Court sentenced one year of imprisonment with prison labor and two years of suspended execution to be a crime of fraud, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on April 28, 2012.

[2012 Highest Group 2116] The Defendant runs a housing construction business with the trade name of “stock company L” from K in Kimhae-si.

1. On October 17, 2007, the Defendant against the victim D made a false statement to the victim D at the above L office of the said L company, stating, “The victim D would be entitled to the right to remove the apartment upon requesting the 30,000,000 won from the Kimhae Construction Contract Deposit, which gives the right to remove the apartment at the time of Gimhae.”

However, the fact did not obtain the consent of the prop at the time, the purchase of the site for redevelopment was not completed, and there was no intention or ability to grant the right to remove to the victim due to the lack of the construction permission.

Nevertheless, the Defendant received 30,000,000 won from the victim’s seat.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

2. Around March 14, 2008, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim E at the above L Office Co., Ltd.’s office stating that “I would give the victim E the right to remove the development project site and the waste disposal work of Nwon city. I would like to grant the right to remove upon request of the victim E with the rebates fund of KRW 30,000,000.”

However, in fact, it was not possible to obtain a loan due to the strengthening of the government's regulation on the PF lending, so it was impossible to purchase the site for apartment construction, and there was no intention or ability to grant the right to remove to the victim due to the lack of the construction permit.

Nevertheless, the defendant was given 30,000,000 won from the victim's seat.