A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 10, 2016, the Defendant, in response to the withdrawal, did not comply with the Defendant 10 minutes even though he/she received a demand from the injured party to leave the said office on the part of the victim C’s D personnel office located in Mapo-si B on March 10, 2016, by bringing the victim’s desire to “Isia” to have his/her personal information leaked.

2. Around March 10, 2016, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, at the office of the said D personnel on the following occasions: (a) on the 20:56 day; (b) on the 112 report that the hostr re-explosed and frighted; and (c) on the part of G from the police officer F of the E police box sent to the site, he was instructed to separately request the law for the erroneous part of G from the police officer, and (d) he was off from the patrol officer, and (e) the above police officer was able to “C f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f.

3. On March 10, 2016, the Defendant: (a) was arrested on a flagrant offender under suspicion of interference with the performance of official duties; and (b) was waiting to a sofab by an E box located in H at the time of breath; and (c) was fabing the ceiling of the sofab, which was kept at his/her own seat, immediately removed on March 10, 2016; and (d) thereby damaging the Defendant’s damage to the equipment used by a public office in terms of repair cost.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement with respect to C and F;

1. G statements;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to each photograph and estimate;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act, Articles 319(2), 319(1) (in those cases, refusing to withdraw), 141(1) (in those cases, impairing goods for public use), and 136(1) (in those cases, obstructing the performance of official duties) of the Criminal Act, and choice of imprisonment for each type of punishment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The primary reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act is the protection observation and community service order, and the victim C does not have to be punished.