1. The defendant on May 21, 1996, as to each land listed in the separate sheet to the plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. According to the Land Survey Book drawn up during the Japanese Occupation Period, C residing in Gyeonggi-si B was subject to respective circumstances on April 15, 1914, which was around 2,549 of Gyeonggi-gu D (hereinafter “1-form land”) and the preceding 1,131 of E (hereinafter “2-form land”).

B. The land of the first assessment is divided into six parcels on November 30, 1968 and F or G parcel numbers were set. Among them, the land category of H on the same day was changed to “river” (hereinafter “the land of this case”). The land of the second assessment is the same as the land of the attached Table 2, the land category of which was changed to a river on June 28, 1968 (hereinafter “the land of this case”) and the land of this case was changed to the name of the administrative district on December 1, 2004.

C. On May 21, 1996, the Defendant completed the registration of preservation of ownership of each of the instant land (hereinafter “registration of preservation of ownership”). D. D. The Defendant completed the registration of preservation of ownership of each of the instant land as the District Court’s Provisional Registry No. 5813.

The plaintiff's increased portion C was deceased on June 1, 1936 and becomes a sole heir, K died on June 17, 1942 and became a sole heir, and L was also a deceased on December 23, 2001 and became one of the co-inheritors.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1 to 11 (including virtual numbers), fact-finding results for Mon Eup, purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. According to the above facts and evidence, at the time of the situation of C, the title holder of each of the circumstances in this case, and the indication of address and name in the Plaintiff’s transcript C, which are the title holder of each of the circumstances in this case, are identical to the name and address at the time of the situation of C, and there is no evidence to deem that there was a title C and name in the above address at the time of the circumstance, the assessment title of each of the circumstances in this case and the Plaintiff’s increased title C shall be deemed the same person.

(b).