logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.07.05 2018고합515
배임증재
Text

[Defendant A] Imprisonment with prison labor for six months

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of one year from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Criminal facts

The head of the D Seoul Branch E has the authority to conclude various contracts related to the profit-making business of the D Seoul Branch in accordance with the D Operation Rules and the Enforcement Rules of Profit-making Business.

1. On April 2006, Defendant A entered into a contract to entrust the operation of the funeral hall with the operation of the F funeral hall, which is a profit-making business of the D Seoul Branch, at D Seoul Branch, and paid 5% of the sales of the funeral hall to D Seoul Branch, and operated the F funeral hall.

In this regard, the defendant can be granted the right to operate another funeral hall by using the name of D Seoul branch office in Eunpyeong-gu, Seoul around April 2008, and from E, the head of D Seoul branch office in the name of D Seoul branch office.

No one shall board or carry D vehicles for his/her business, and he/she shall board or take a high-quality vehicle.

In order to provide E with only one unit of vehicle, and to provide E with the maintenance cost of the vehicle with H, an employee at the funeral hall, who is an employee at the funeral hall, in receipt of the proposal.

With respect to the right to entrust the operation of the funeral hall, the Defendant offered one motor vehicle for the 48,400,000 won at the market price from June 24, 2008 to October 18, 2012, while making an illegal solicitation to E. The Defendant paid 6,946,120 won in total for four times from June 24, 2008 to October 18, 2012, and the Defendant paid 22 times in total each time from July 2008 to March 30, 2010, each time from April 28, 2010 to May 38, 2013, it is apparent that the instant facts charged were lawfully recorded in the evidence of this case, and thus, it is apparent that the court duly adopted the evidence of this case, as the evidence of this case.

Over the course, 196,00,000 won in total as shown in the list of annexed crimes, such as 4,000,000 won in cash each time, were provided as the maintenance cost of the vehicle.

2. Defendant B is the K hospital L in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government J, which was leased and operated by D Seoul Branch on May 2, 2014.

arrow