The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the reasons for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The defendant damaged mountainous districts to engage in farming activities, and there are some points to be considered in the circumstances.

However, the defendant has a record of being punished for the same crime in 2009 as well as the area of the mountainous district of 1,132 square meters by damaging the mountainous district.

In addition, comprehensively taking account of the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, motive, means, and consequence of the crime, all of the sentencing conditions in the instant case, such as the circumstances after the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment is only within the reasonable scope of discretion, and it is difficult to view it as unfair because it is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is difficult to accept.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.