1. The plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant).

purport, purport, and.

1. The grounds for the quoted decision of the court of first instance are the same as those for the decision of the court of first instance other than the following, and thus, they shall be quoted by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[Judgment of the court of first instance] On No. 4th 13 of the judgment of the court of first instance, the phrase “new facts are acknowledged, but new facts are found,” and the phrase “if the advertising tower in this case is viewed from F to F to the direction of Gwangju Airport, it is deemed that a certain range of visibility has been reduced.”

On the 4th judgment of the first instance court, the advertisement tower of this case is still exposed to the vehicle that proceeds from G in the direction of Gwangju public direction in the direction of Gwangju public direction, so it is not determined that the reduction in the distance above did not cause a critical problem in the advertising contract of this case by significantly lowering the effect of the advertisement inserted in the advertising tower of this case. In addition, if viewing the advertising tower in the direction of the F in Gwangju public domain and viewing the advertising tower in the two directions between H hospital and I reservoir, the above 20th floor building does not affect the advertising tower of this case) shall be described as "the existence of the above 20th floor building does not affect the advertising tower of this case".

2. Conclusion, the judgment of the first instance court is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.