1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

The reasoning of the judgment of this court, which cited the judgment of the court of first instance, is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the defendant added a judgment on the following arguments emphasized again by the court of second instance.

The additional part of the defendant's assertion did not conclude a contract with the plaintiff, and only paid personnel expenses by concluding a daily labor contract with B, etc.

Since the defendant has already paid all labor costs to B, the plaintiff's claim is without merit.

Judgment

The following circumstances, which can be acknowledged by comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 4, 6, and 7, Eul evidence Nos. 2 and 3, and Eul evidence Nos. 2 and 3, and Eul evidence Nos. 1, 1, 2017 witness D’s testimony and arguments, i.e., the plaintiff’s husband B sent to the defendant 73,820,500 won of the construction amount by e-mail. On Nov. 21, 2017, J, an employee of the defendant, sent the amount of construction amount to the defendant 65,508,007 won based on the volume identified by the defendant b on Dec. 4, 2017 (the defendant issued the above specifications to ascertain the amount of construction price executed by the defendant 201, excluding the amount of construction price paid by the plaintiff 201, excluding the plaintiff 203, 2013).

As recognized in the above paragraph, it is reasonable to view that there was an oral agreement on the contract, and the evidence submitted by the defendant alone is insufficient to reverse it.