logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2016.01.08 2015고단1820
마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)등
Text

In the case of crimes Nos. 1 and 2 of the judgment of the defendant and crimes No. 3 through No. 8 of the judgment of the defendant, one year of imprisonment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 4, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of suspension of execution in October, 201 by reason of the registration of loan business, etc. and the violation of the Act on the Protection of Financial Users, etc. in the Changwon District Court’s Tong branch branch on the following occasions: (a) the judgment became final and conclusive on November 15, 2012; and (b) the prosecutor, despite the submission of relevant evidence, deemed that each of the crimes listed in the list of crimes No. 3 as indicated in the judgment, is a single comprehensive crime and did not enter in the facts charged; (c) however, it is difficult to recognize the temporal distance between the time of each crime and the time so it is difficult to recognize the temporal distance, and thus, it does not constitute a single comprehensive crime. After Article 37 of the Criminal Act, the Defendant added a criminal record related to a final judgment, which serves as the basis for

1. On July 28, 2004, the Defendant was a person who operates the bond business in the building D located in Changwon District Court, and was sentenced to the imprisonment of eight months for violation of the Narcotics Control Act (Seoul District Court Decision 2004 Gowon Branch Office 362, 2004 Gowon Branch Office 2004, 5609). On April 2004, the Defendant was under investigation by C with regard to the foregoing case and was under contact with C frequently after being informed of the contact with the said case, from around 17, 199 to around 5, 204, and was appointed as a public prosecutor of the Incheon District Public Prosecutor's office from around 22, 2004 to around 10, 194 to the local public prosecutor's office from around 15, 200, and was working as a public prosecutor of the public prosecutor's office in the new local public prosecutor's office from around 10, 2015.

On November 2013, the Defendant was asked by the F Hospital located in Si-si E to resolve the case (Article 2013 type No. 27143 of the Changwon District Prosecutors' Office, Article 2714 of the Act on the Control of Suspect H, Narcotics, etc.) in which the indictment against H is suspended from G and H at the Changwon District Prosecutors' Office located in Changwon District Prosecutors' Office located in Si-si at the end of November 2013, and the Defendant offered a bribe to C and resolved the case.

arrow