1. The Defendant’s KRW 200,000,000 as well as 5% per annum from October 31, 2013 to February 27, 2014 to the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On October 15, 2002, B and the Defendant entered into a lease agreement between B and the Defendant with the following terms of lease agreement:

(hereinafter “Lease Contract”). Lease object: Lease period of 4 to 9 (hereinafter “instant building”) among buildings listed in the attached list owned by the Defendant: From October 15, 2002 to October 15, 2008: Lease deposit amount of 200 million won: KRW 12 million per month and the Defendant completed the registration of the establishment of chonsegwon as follows to secure the right to return the lease deposit:

(2) The term "right to lease on a deposit basis" is "registration of the right to lease on a deposit basis," and when the right to lease on a deposit basis is referred to as "right to lease on a deposit basis": The entire term of the building of this case between October 15, 2002 and October 15, 2004: October 15, 2004.

The Plaintiff’s provisional attachment, seizure, and collection order 1) The Plaintiff’s entire claim for the refund of security deposit against the Defendant under the Daegu District Court 201Kadan91111 on October 20, 201 (hereinafter “instant security deposit refund claim”).

(2) The provisional attachment ruling of this case (hereinafter “instant provisional attachment ruling”)

(2) On November 8, 2011, the provisional attachment decision was served on the Defendant on November 2, 201, and on November 8, 2011, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against B seeking reimbursement of the amount of reimbursement under the Daegu District Court 2013No804684.

On July 5, 2013, the court rendered a judgment that "B shall pay to the Plaintiff 1,304,163,113 won and 1,304,160,416 won among them, 14% per annum from November 1, 2011 to January 31, 2012, 16% per annum from the next day to November 30, 2012, 12% per annum from the next day to May 13, 2013, 200% per annum, 20% per annum from the next day to the day of full payment, and 30% per annum from the next day to the day of full payment." The above judgment was finalized on July 27, 2013.

3. The plaintiff is based on the above final judgment on August 1, 2013.