logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.01.11 2018고단4555
사기
Text

[Defendant A, B, C, D, and E] Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for two months.

, however, for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] Defendant A was sentenced to four years of imprisonment for a crime of fraud, etc. at the Incheon District Court on May 12, 2016, and the above judgment was finalized on October 25, 2016, and on December 16, 2016, Defendant A was sentenced to four years of imprisonment for a crime of fraud, etc. in the Suwon District Court’s Ansan Branch on December 16, 2016, and the above judgment was finalized on October 26, 2017.

Defendant

B On May 12, 2016, the Incheon District Court sentenced three years and six months to imprisonment for a crime of fraud at the Incheon District Court on November 11, 2016, which became final and conclusive on November 11, 2016, and on December 16, 2016, the said judgment became final and conclusive on May 27, 2017.

Defendant

C On May 12, 2016, the Incheon District Court sentenced two years to imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Incheon District Court, and the said judgment was finalized on September 8, 2016. On August 30, 2018, the Suwon District Court sentenced two years and four months to imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Suwon District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on November 2, 2018.

Defendant

D On May 12, 2016, the Incheon District Court sentenced one year and ten months of imprisonment for fraud at the Incheon District Court, which became final and conclusive on September 20, 2016. On August 30, 2018, the Suwon District Court sentenced three years and four years of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Suwon District Court, which became final and conclusive on September 7, 2018.

Defendant

E on April 26, 2016, sentenced to imprisonment of two years and six months for fraud, etc. in the Suwon District Court's Ansan branch on April 26, 2016, and the above judgment was finalized on November 2, 2018.

[Publically, the Defendants planned to commit a telecommunications-based financial fraud (tentatively named “scaming”) by deceiving money by means of deleting a credit rating from a large number of unspecified loan applicants on May 2015 and sending credit management expenses. Defendant B, taking overall control of the first call center, made the first call center to identify the personal information of the loan applicants at low interest, and sent the details of the loan applicants’ personal information and the details of the credit collection to the second call center managed by Defendant A.

arrow