logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.02.02 2016고단5116
사문서위조등
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for five months, and the execution of each of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. A crime committed on July 15, 201;

A. On July 18, 201, the Defendants drafted an agreement on the loan of up to five million won in the name of the Defendant at the Jeju Credit Union, even though they were located in the city of South and North Korea on July 18, 201, and Defendant A is the her husband D to the employees in charge of the loan, and Defendant B is the her husband D in the joint guarantor column of the loan agreement as the her husband was D.

D’s seal, and continuously affixed a “personal (credit) information inquiry consent”, “personal (credit) information collection, use, and written consent”, and affixed a D’s seal on the name side.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to act on behalf of the Defendants for the purpose of exercising the rights and obligations as above, and conspireded to the “loan Agreement,” “Personal Information Inquiry Consent,” “Personal Information Collection, Use, and Provision of Personal Information” in the name of D, a private document.

B. The Defendants conspired to use the above investigation document at the same time and submitted the forged document to the above C as if it were a document duly formed.

(c)

The Defendants engaged in the unlawful uttering of official documents in collusion, at the same time, and at the same place, the above D’s identification card was requested by the above C, and the D’s resident registration certificate under the name of the State Mayor, which was the official document held by the Defendant A, was presented as if the Defendant B’s resident registration certificate was the Defendant B’s resident registration certificate.

2. A crime committed on July 15, 2013;

A. On July 15, 2013, the Defendants forged private documents prepared the “Additional Agreement for Extension of Time Limit for Large-Term” in order to extend the above-mentioned loans at the Jeju Credit Union on July 15, 2013, and Defendant A is deemed to be his husband D, and Defendant B is “D” in the joint guarantor column of the Additional Agreement for Extension of Time Limit for Large-term as he was D.

arrow