logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원진주지원 2015.09.04 2014가단13965
임료 등
Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant B’s appraisal of KRW 9,822,270 and KRW 985 square meters in Jinju-si from May 16, 2015, indicated on the attached sheet 6.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is a party’s position 1) On June 16, 2006, the Plaintiff is a party’s land E in Jinju-si, Jinju-si, 985 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”).

(2) The owner is the owner who completed the registration of ownership transfer based on sale and purchase with respect to the instant land. (2) The owner of F 99 square meters adjacent to the instant land in Jinju-si is Defendant B, and ② the owner of G 591 square meters prior to Jin-si is Defendant C, and ③ the owner of Jin-si in Jin-si is Defendant D.

B. (1) The Plaintiff filed a lawsuit seeking the delivery of land on the ground that the Defendants, as the Jinwon District Court Branch 2013Gadan559, partially invaded the boundary of the instant land, occupy the building by newly building the building or planting trees. (2) The Jinwon District Court rendered a judgment as follows on January 16, 2014, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on February 6, 2014.

The Plaintiff

1. Defendant B’s appraisal of the attached sheet No. 6, 7, 23, 22, 21, 19, 20, 20, and 6 among the attached sheet No. 985 square meters in Jinju-si E, Jinju-si, with the part of 41 square meters inboard (c) (hereinafter “c (c) portion”) connected in sequence to each point.

2. The Defendant C’s appraisal of the attached Form No. 8, 9, 10, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 22, 23, and 8 in the order of each of the items indicated in the attached Form No. 8, 9, 10, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 22, 23, and 8 (hereinafter

3. The defendant D shall deliver each of the attached Table 12, 13, 14, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, and 12 attached hereto, among the area of 985 square meters in Jinju-si E, Jin-si, and the part of 34 square meters in the ship (e.g., e., e., e., e., e., part) connected in sequence.

3) Notwithstanding the fact that the above judgment became final and conclusive, the Defendants did not deliver each part of their possession to the Plaintiff as of the date of the closing of the argument in this case. [The fact that there is no dispute over the grounds for recognition, the entries in Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 3,

2. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. According to the above facts, the Defendants occupied part of the instant land owned by the Plaintiff without any lawful title.

arrow