logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2020.06.25 2019구합67098
부당해고구제재심판정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit, including the part resulting from the supplementary participation, are all assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the decision on retrial;

A. The Plaintiff is a company that regularly employs about 50 workers and operates an “E hotel” (hereinafter “E hotel”) located in D in a leisure time, and operates the hotel business, etc.

The Intervenor joining the Defendant (hereinafter referred to as the “ Intervenor”) is a person employed by the Plaintiff on May 1, 2018 and served as the manager of the instant hotel by November 27, 2018.

B. On November 27, 2018, the Plaintiff: (a) held a personnel committee to the Intervenor on November 27, 2018; (b) neglected to report to the Intervenor on October 1, 2018, 2018, i.e., the Intervenor raised the Plaintiff’s speech to F, damaged the entrance; and (c) failed to file any report thereafter; (d) neglected to do so. Around September 2018, the Plaintiff issued a false notice of dismissal on the ground that the Plaintiff’s dismissal of the Intervenor was in violation of the Rules of Employment on the grounds that it interfered with the Plaintiff’s fraud and interfered with the management and supervision of its subordinate employees. Around September 2018, 2018, the Plaintiff issued a false notice that the Plaintiff would offer rebates to F with respect to the goods selling-price. In so doing, the Plaintiff’s dismissal of the Intervenor on the ground that the Plaintiff violated the Rules of Employment on the grounds that the dismissal was recognized.

C. On December 11, 2018, the Intervenor asserted that “the instant dismissal is unfair,” the Plaintiff as the respondent, and filed an application for unfair dismissal relief with the former Regional Labor Relations Commission.

On January 30, 2019, the Jeonnam Regional Labor Relations Commission instructed an intervenor on October 1, 2018, to comply with working hours, taking due care for the failure of the intervenor to early leave his or her new staff. The intervenor’s act of destroying the door by a large voice.

arrow