logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전고등법원(청주) 2016.01.27 2015누10224
상이등급기준미달결정처분취소
Text

The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance.

Reasons

The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows: (a) the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows: (b) the term “in fact falling under class 7 or higher”; (c) the term “in fact falling under class 7 or higher”; (d) the term “in fact” of the fifth class 18, the term “in fact” of the seventh class 13, the term “in the first instance court”; and (d) the term “in the seventh class 17 through 9, the term “in the first instance court” of the first instance court; and (e) the term “in the first instance court” of the seventh class 17 through the 9th class 20th class as described in the second class; and (e) the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance are as shown in Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act; and (e) the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. In full view of all the evidence mentioned above; and (e) the purport of the entire arguments as to the head of the hospital of the first class.

A. Paragraphs (3) and (4) of this Article are recognized only on the date of an objective inspection, and the degree of vision and vision, etc. is recognized only where it is possible to explain it with internal and current medical knowledge. ② Since the method of measuring visual force by the visual chart is performed by a method of responding to whether a patient voluntarily appears, it is difficult to measure an objective visual power excluded from subjectiveness. Therefore, it is important to examine whether there is an objective medical opinion to support the decline of visual power in which a patient subjective appeal is lodged through an objective inspection, such as the visual test, internal-cell test, the body transmission, the body transmission, and the yellow half layer shooting. ③ However, on September 24, 2014, in the case of the Plaintiff, it is important to examine whether there is an objective medical opinion to support the decline of visual power that the patient appeals subjectively through an objective examination, such as the visual test, the visual force in the distance measured in accordance with the visual force chart conducted by the Glin University in the Nlin University Hospital at the Nlin University.

arrow