1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff, including the part arising from the supplementary participation.

1. The court's explanation concerning this case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, the court's explanation concerning this case is acceptable as it is in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420

(1) The court below's decision that rejected the plaintiff's claim is justifiable and thus dismissed. The court below's decision that rejected the plaintiff's claim is just on the ground that the plaintiff's claim is not reasonable. Thus, the court below's decision that rejected the plaintiff's claim is just because the plaintiff's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed as it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices, even if the evidence submitted by the court of first instance and all evidence submitted by the court of first instance and evidence Nos. 11, 12, and 13 submitted by the court of first instance were examined.