(영문) 전주지방법원 정읍지원 2020.01.30 2019고단458

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 전주지방법원 정읍지원 2020.01.30 2019고단458

공무집행방해

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 11, 2019, the Defendant reported 112 to the effect that “the cafeteria and the key of the vehicle have been set up in the restaurant,” in front of the ancient Chang-gun, Chang-gun, Go Chang-gun, 191, the Defendant reported 192 on the street in front of the ancient terminal, Chang-gun, Chang Chang-gun, 191, that “the cafeteria was set down in the restaurant, and the cafeteria was not forced to open the cafeteria from the police officers dispatched, the Defendant was able to say that the police officers were not forced to open the cafeteria.” The Defendant was able to see that the Defendant’s name was read as “influencing the phone at the Gyeong-si, Go Chang-gun, Chang-gun, Chang-gun, Chang-gun, the Defendant was able to see that he was her at the right time when he was her, and he was her her at the time when he was her her, and he was her her with the right time.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the handling of 112 reported cases and the maintenance of order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. The police statement concerning B;

1. A CD or a DNA image to capture a CD or a DNA image stored;

1. Photographs photographs of the suspect's mobile phone calls;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal report (famp image verification);

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 136 of the Criminal Act and Article 136 of the Criminal Act for the crime have records of being sentenced to a fine and a suspended sentence execution on several occasions by drinking alcohol, fraud, obstruction of business, etc.

[Attachment 1,00,000 won for the crime of interference with business on September 3, 2019, and 2,00,000 won for fraud on August 28, 2019] The Defendant reported the key to the crime of interference with business on September 3, 2019. The Defendant reported it to 112 to find the key due to a drunken drinking, and the police officer dispatched to the police was unable to have any choice but no choice but to take care of the key, and exercised violence.

A good faith is rather different due to the defendant who made unnecessary waste of public power.

참조조문

-형법 제136조

유사 판례

-의정부지방법원 고양지원 2021.03.25 2020고단2841

-춘천지방법원 영월지원 2019.01.22 2018고단436

-창원지방법원 거창지원 2021.04.21 2020고정126

-춘천지방법원 2020.02.13 2019고단1189

-춘천지방법원 2020.10.29 2020고단832