1. All appeals by the plaintiff (appointed party) are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff (Appointed Party).

1. Basic facts

A. Status 1 of the parties, etc.) Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Company”).

) As a company running a sports facility business, etc., H, a sports facility located on six lots, including Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G, (hereinafter “instant sports center”).

Defendant C has been working as the representative director of Defendant C from 1994 to 100, and Defendant C has been working as the representative director of Defendant C’s company. 2) The designated parties D have F and E as their children between Plaintiff I and his wife.

B. On September 6, 1997, the Selection E entered into an agreement with the Defendant Company to enter the sports center as a general corporate member of the instant sports center. A person who holds a membership card issued by the Defendant Company from the Defendant Company to a general corporate member of the sports center is deemed as a kind of bearer membership right that can use the instant sports center even if he is not the nominal owner of the membership card. One Chapter (Membership number: L; hereinafter referred to as the “instant membership right”).

2) The Plaintiff and the remaining designated parties and I have used the instant sports center using the instant membership.

C. 1) On April 20, 2009, the Plaintiff: “Around September 15, 2008, the Plaintiff got a dispute at a health club of the sports center of this case as a matter of the victim J and R&S Nos. 16:00 on September 15, 2008, while the Plaintiff had a dispute, the Plaintiff had to go to the J for about three weeks of medical treatment (hereinafter “the instant injury case”).”

As to the facts charged, the summary order of KRW 700,00 was issued on June 9, 2009 by Seoul Central District Court Decision 2009 High Court Decision 2009 High Court Decision 2009 High Court Decision 2009 High Court Decision 20612 decided on February 18, 201, the plaintiff appealed and filed a formal trial under the Seoul Central District Court Decision 2009 High Court Decision 200,000 won for the same criminal facts, and the plaintiff is dissatisfied with this.