logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2014.09.18 2014가합264
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendants’ respective Plaintiff amounting to KRW 229,594,59, and KRW 5% per annum from September 15, 2012 to September 18, 2014.

Reasons

Based on the facts, Defendant B and C shared 1/2 shares of each of the Class II neighborhood living facilities (hereinafter “the instant building”) of the fifth five stories of the Seo-gu Daejeon E-Sresh concrete structure, and Defendant D operated a singing practice room (hereinafter “instant singing practice room”) with the trade name “F” by leasing the first floor above the instant building from March 31, 2012 to March 31, 2012.

On September 15, 2012, the Plaintiff fells into the first floor floor of the underground through a space between stairs and walls, exceeding 90 cms (e.g., 90cm in height, 1st floor and 3 cm in height with underground floor) from among the flight stairs of the instant building (hereinafter “instant stairs”) in order to drink drinking water at around 23:00 and 4 drinking water and to take the singing practice room of the instant building, the Plaintiff fell into the first floor of the instant stairs (hereinafter “instant accident”). As a result, the Plaintiff is in the state of fluoral fladity, by suffering from injuries, such as an injury, such as a e.g., blood transfusion and external fluoral dyke, blood transfusions on the left side, and two mouths on the left side.

On the underground floor of the building of this case, there are no other stores other than the singing room of this case, and the entrances allowing access to the singing room of this case are elevators, main entrances on the side of a big road, and escape stairs where the accident of this case occurred.

The instant stairs and rails were installed by Defendant B and C, the owner of the said building, and there was no change from the time of the instant accident. The entrance of the first floor of the said stairs was installed by Defendant D, but the entrance was opened during business hours, any person could have access to the entrance without any specific restriction, and Defendant D used the camera at the direction of the entrance of the instant stairs.

【In the absence of dispute, Gap's statements and images as to Gap's evidence 1, 3, 4, 8, 9, 10 (including paper numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul's evidence 2 and 3, and the result of on-site verification by this court, the whole purport of the arguments.

arrow