1. Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000;

2. If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On November 4, 2012, E visited a garden with her mother and set up Fone Star Car in the above C parking lot, while the Defendant, who operates the C(D) legal party in Yangsan City, was under dispute over the parking problems of E and Pyeongtaek in the vicinity of the above law party, the Defendant stated that E visited the garden with her mother and set up a Fone Star Car in the above C parking lot, and argued that E escaped from traffic accidents by driving a car with 112, who throw away from her own car.

reported.

Accordingly, on February 8, 2013, E received a summary order of a fine of KRW 3 million due to a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes in the Busan District Court's Dong Branch branch branch, and filed a request for formal trial in objection thereto.

On the other hand, after the issuance of the above summary order, E filed an accusation against the Defendant, and the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 3 million by the Ulsan District Court on June 18, 2015, and the judgment became final and conclusive on December 15, 2015.

Criminal facts

On October 22, 2015, the Defendant testified to the effect that, at around 15:30 on October 22, 2015, the Busan District Court Decision 2014, 304, the Busan District Court Decision 304, the Busan District Court rendered a testimony to the effect that, “The Defendant was present at the court as a witness of the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (EM) against E against the above court Decision 2014, 1366, 1366, and “the Defendant was absent while driving the said vehicle,” and “the Defendant was faced with the vehicle intentionally, not intentionally, and E was able to proceed with the vehicle with a deadly weapon.”

However, in fact, at around 11:05 on November 4, 2012, the Defendant was faced with the Defendant on the front part of the vehicle he driven by E while driving the vehicle at the time of the vehicle at the front, reporting and stopping the Defendant coming from the front side, even though he stopped the vehicle at the front, and there was no fact that E was a Defendant by driving the vehicle at the front part of the vehicle without neglecting the front line.

Ultimately, the defendant makes a false statement contrary to his memory.