beta
Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The summary of the facts charged is the company won.
On October 01, 2015, at around 07:40 on 07:0 on 01, 201, the Defendant: (a) prevented the victim B (the age of 22) from taking an emergency store (exclusive entrance and exit) beyond 97 ods. Madro Madro Madro Madro Madro Madro Madro Madro Madro Madro Madro Madro Madro Madro Madro Madro ma; and (b)
2. The facts charged of this case are crimes falling under Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim's express intent under Article 260 (3) of the Criminal Act. Since the victim withdraws his/her wish to punish the defendant after the prosecution, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 (6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.