1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

The plaintiff, at around 20:00 on May 1, 2012, 2012, he saw the plaintiff's clothes as a scambling act, and scam and scambling the plaintiff's face, trees, clothes, and chests for about 2 weeks of treatment. As a result, the plaintiff suffered damages equivalent to KRW 2 million of treatment expenses, KRW 5 million of daily income, KRW 17 million of consolation money, and KRW 17 million of compensation, and thus, the defendant should compensate the plaintiff for the above damages.

According to the statement in Gap evidence No. 1, it can be acknowledged that the plaintiff suffered from sacrificing damage, gym, tag, sacrife, and sacrife, etc. of the plaintiff around the above date. However, it is insufficient to recognize that the above facts alone are sufficient to recognize that the defendant had sexual intercourse against the plaintiff or had such bodily injury, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

The plaintiff's assertion is without merit without examining it.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just with this conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.