logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.02.03 2016고정42
절도등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. From August 31, 2015 to around 19:00 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) performed the above Schlage entrance and its surrounding drinking on the ground that the victim reported himself/herself to the police from the victim C, operated by the victim C, located in the Busan Sastro-gu, Busan, the day from August 31, 2015 to around 19:30 on the same day; and (b) made a large report to the police with the victim’s complaint;

B. The victim 30 minutes obstructed the victim’s Schlage’s operations by force, such as that the customer who visited the Schlage by visiting the Schlage was unable to get out of his house.

2. The Defendant: (a) around 18:59 on the same day as the preceding paragraph 18:59, at the cooling house and the police station in which alcoholic beverages are stored in the same Schlage; (b) at the victim’s display room, the Defendant brought one of the homeballs equivalent to the market price of KRW 1,500, the victim’s market value to KRW 1,300. Accordingly, the Defendant stolen the victim’s property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation (the place of occurrence D Skis and damaged images), internal investigation report (the attachment of photographs by capturing CCTV-related CCTV-related to the crime, such as interference with the duties of the accused), internal investigation report (the attachment of the table of 112 reported case);

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 329 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Taking into account the following: (a) the reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the Aggravated Punishment of the Provisional Payment Order: (b) the recognition of the Defendant’s crime and its depth and reflection; (c) the Defendant’s reimbursement of excessive damages to the victim; and (d) the health of the Defendant is

arrow