logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2018.09.06 2018고단1506
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Power of crime] On February 9, 2007, the Defendant received a summary order of one million won or more as a crime of violating road traffic law (drinking driving), and a summary order of one million won or more as a fine from the Chuncheon District Court on April 23, 2008 to the same crime.

[Criminal facts]

1. Despite the fact that the Defendant had been punished for drinking on at least two occasions, on July 2, 2018, the Defendant driven a B-car under the influence of alcohol concentration of approximately 2.5 km from the 106 km away from the 67 km-ro, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, to the fri-ro, 263 Doz. 106 Doz., the Defendant driven a B-car under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 0.061% from the 2.5 km-ro to the west side of 106 Doz.

2. The defendant, who violated the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) is a person engaged in driving of the said car;

At the date stated in Paragraph 1, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol as above, and proceeded to Gwangju City from the side of Section 106, an enzym apartment apartment of 106, an enzymar apartment of 67 Doo-ro, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, Seoul, about 263 Doo-ro.

Since there is a place near the intersection, the driver of the motor vehicle had a duty of care to live well on the right and the right of the front and the right and the right of the driver, and to operate the steering and the operation of the steering system accurately.

Nevertheless, the Defendant’s negligence, while under the influence of alcohol, led to the Defendant’s failure to see the front door and the front part of the pertinent car driven by the Defendant, which led to the Defendant’s shocking part of the victim C(41 tax) who was in the atmosphere of the signal at the front.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as salt, tension, etc., in need of approximately two weeks of medical treatment due to occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement of the occurrence of a traffic accident C;

1. A traffic accident report, a report on the detection of a primary driver, and a report on the detection of a primary driver;

arrow