A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Punishment of the crime

Since 10 years ago, the Defendant had been receiving mental treatment due to the stimulative disorder, and from February 2014, the Defendant was receiving hospitalized treatment at the Dic Hospital located in Jinju City C.

On September 1, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 17:30, at the above Dic Hospital (Dic Hospital) around September 1, 2014, the Defendant was faced with the victim E, a patient at the same hospital, who was hospitalized in the same hospital, and had the victim E, a patient at the same hospital, and decided to discharge the patient after consultation with the doctor in charge.

After that, at around 17:45 on the same day, the defendant returned to the two rooms of the opening ward of the above hospital living by the defendant and returned to the two rooms of the opening ward of the above hospital living by the defendant, and moved to one room of the opening ward of the above hospital dealing with the victim, which is a dangerous object located on the floor of the defendant bedle (11cm in the blade length), and led to the victim's leaving the left side and the right side side of the victim once.

As a result, the defendant put the victim into the upper right side, which requires treatment for about two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E and F;

1. The list of seizure;

1. The actual sulfur survey report (including photographs of the actual sulfur record);

1. Excessive photographs and photographs of the upper part of the victim;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of inflicting an injury on a dangerous object);

1. The defendant and his/her defense counsel asserted that the defendant and his/her defense counsel had weak the ability to discern things or make decisions by extreme interest at the time of committing the crime of this case. Thus, according to the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, the defendant committed an act of covering food on the food on the food board, which had been accompanied by the victim immediately before committing the crime of this case, overcoming the victim's face, and thereby released the defendant after interviews with the doctor in charge.